In this judgment, the Third Chamber of the Provincial Court (Court of Appeals) confirms the judgment of first instance in its entirety and rejects all of Anfi's requests.
Read MoreANFI. Court of Appeals nº 5 grants also the anticipated monies.
On this occasion, the Court of Appeals, again, corrects the Court of First Instance and grants the monies paid in advance. In this case it was 15,000 euros.
Read MoreANFI. New ruling of the Court nº 3 declaring contracts null and void.
As on other occasions sometimes happens that there are Courts in Maspalomas that, despite declaring contracts null and void, do not recognize the right to also receive the unduly advanced money. This then is grounds for appeal and the Court of Appeals rectifies this error and grants them (as can be seen in the following post).
ANFI. New victory. More than 30,000 euros back to the client.
This time the Court of Appeals not only confirms the First Instance decision to declare the contract null and void with payment of 142,800 Norwegian crones (14,155.01 euros), but also grants the return of unduly anticipated monies. In this case, the client will receive an extra 170,000 NOK (16,851.20 euros)
Read MoreCourt victory against ANFI. Court nº 3. Total win, return of price and anticipated monies, plus legal costs
This time the Anfi Group has been condemned to pay 15,352 euros as part of the price (the non used years) and another 20,200 as anticipated monies. They will also have to pay legal costs and interests since the date of filing the claim until it’s full payment. Not too bad ;)
Read MoreANFI defeated in Court nº 3. Purchase price and advances to be returned
This is a Court of First Instance judgement. It was issued last year, in June. Now is on appeal by Anfi. This second stage may take another year and a half or even two, depending very much in which Court of Appeals and Room deals with the case.
Read MoreDoes the timeshare industry love ignorant consumers?
I have recently come across an article posted by Christophe Elliot with this very suggestive title, Does the timeshare industry love ignorant consumers? that for its doubtless interest I reproduce below:
"Businesses like to say their best customers are educated ones. But that doesn’t necessarily apply to the timeshare industry.
Read MoreTimeshare. Anfi Beach. Recent rulings in favor of consumers.
I recently had the opportunity to know about several judgments, namely five, ruled by the Court of First Instance number THREE, of San Bartolome de Tirajana, in which his lordship, Judge Mr. Armando Garcia Castellano, changing his approach so far, declared null and void the contracts signed at the time by my clients -I acted in these trials in ...
Read MoreNew judgment of the Court of Appeal in Las Palmas against ANFI
The judgment has date of 21st february 2013 and was notified to my colleague, Miguel Rodríguez with whom I have collaborated during the last three years on Timeshare cases, on the 8th of March.
Read More