Sometimes happens, very rarely to be honest, that the judgment exceeds the most optimistic forecasts, in this case, the Court of First Instance number 1 of Arona declares the contracts of my clients null and void, with the right to the return of the money paid in advance, interest and legal costs.
Read MoreANFI. Victory at the First Instance court nº 3 in Maspalomas. Some data. Post 2
This is the judgment that I mentioned in my previous post. There I commented on the decision of the appeal that confirmed this other that I now publish.
Read MoreANFI. Court of Appeals. New victory fully confirming first instance judgement. Post 1
This time Room 5 of the Court of Appeals (Audiencia Provincial) confirms the first instance judgment in its entirety. I didn't publish this first decision when I should, but I'll do it after this as it'll make more sense of this post.
Read MoreANFI. More judgements and some information.
This is an old judgement that I did not post at the time. On this occasion, the Court of First Instance No. 3 of San Bartolomé de Tirajana ordered Anfi to pay my clients the lump sum of 35,552 euros, declaring the contract void and acknowledging the payment of unduly anticipated amounts. It also orders the payment of expenses and legal interests.
Read MoreANFI condemned to pay €41,655.81 plus legal costs and interests.
In this judgment, the Third Chamber of the Provincial Court (Court of Appeals) confirms the judgment of first instance in its entirety and rejects all of Anfi's requests.
Read MoreSILVERPOINT. Court of Appeals nº 3 a new ruling against them.
There is little more we can say about the rulings against Silverpoint. Once again, a Court declares their contracts null and void with a return of the proportional part of the unused years. Silverpoint is in bankruptcy proceedings and I hope to be able to report on its progress in the next few days with an explanatory post.
REGENCY. Court of appeals declares contracts null and void.
Chamber number 3 of the Court of Appeal (Provincial Court) of Tenerife has confirmed the first of the judgments that declared the contracts void for not having a specific object in accordance with article 9.1.3 of Law 42/98 and for being for an unlimited time, in contravention of article 3 of the aforementioned Law. It also considered buyers as consumers. The not so beneficial part of the judgment reduces the amount to be received because it deducts from the total amount the amounts paid as maintenance fees. Still, clients will receive £ 67,623 plus interest for filing the lawsuit. This is a good precedent for all those Regency members who want to see their contracts terminated.
MARRIOTT. Court nº 3 in Marbella. A total win.
The ruling declares the nullity of the contract because timeshare sold by Marriott (MVCI) violate the law in several very important aspects. In the first place they do not comply with the Spanish Law and with the information requirements that it imposes
Read MoreCLUB LA PINTA. some notes on my trial this week.
As I mentioned in my social networks, on Wednesday morning I had a trial in which I requested the nullity of a contract of Club La Pinta. The defendant companies were International Holidayway Marketing, S.L., Las Vistas Marketing, S.L. and Telpar Ventures, Inc. These contracts are substantially void because:
Read MoreANFI. Court nº 3 declares contract null and void, returns anticipated monies, and condemns in costs and interests.
I received this sentence some time ago, in fact it is now on appeal pending, since last September 23, 2019, that the Court of Appeals set a date for the Deliberation, Voting and Judgment.
Read More