On this occasion, the Court of Appeals, again, corrects the Court of First Instance and grants the monies paid in advance. In this case it was 15,000 euros.
Read MoreANFI. New ruling of the Court nº 3 declaring contracts null and void.
As on other occasions sometimes happens that there are Courts in Maspalomas that, despite declaring contracts null and void, do not recognize the right to also receive the unduly advanced money. This then is grounds for appeal and the Court of Appeals rectifies this error and grants them (as can be seen in the following post).
ANFI. New judgement, this time Court of First Instance nº 4 in Maspalomas.
In this case Court nº 4 has ruled in favor of my client only 6 days after the Pre-trial took place. No Trial was needed so the Judge issued the decision based on the initial papers submitted by both parties. The client is entitled to the return of £17,075.13 for his contract nullity.
Read MoreANFI. New victory. More than 30,000 euros back to the client.
This time the Court of Appeals not only confirms the First Instance decision to declare the contract null and void with payment of 142,800 Norwegian crones (14,155.01 euros), but also grants the return of unduly anticipated monies. In this case, the client will receive an extra 170,000 NOK (16,851.20 euros)
Read MoreCourt victory against ANFI. Court nº 3. Total win, return of price and anticipated monies, plus legal costs
This time the Anfi Group has been condemned to pay 15,352 euros as part of the price (the non used years) and another 20,200 as anticipated monies. They will also have to pay legal costs and interests since the date of filing the claim until it’s full payment. Not too bad ;)
Read MoreFAIRWAYS CLUB contracts' also declared null and void!
This judgment was issued by Court No. 3 of Granadilla de Abona and it declares the nullity of the contracts signed by my clients with the developers and management companies of the "Fairways Club" …
Read MoreANFI condemned by Court nº 1. Floating Contract and return of 9,526 pounds.
This is the judgment that I mentioned yesterday on my Social Networks (Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn, where you can also follow my updates quicker).
It is a judgment of the Court of First Instance No. 1 of Maspalomas. This Court, together with No. 5, are the only two who are not holding Trials because they do not consider the interrogation of my clients necessary, so they issue a judgment directly after the Preliminary Hearing ("Audiencia Previa")
Read MoreANFI defeated in Court nº 3. Purchase price and advances to be returned
This is a Court of First Instance judgement. It was issued last year, in June. Now is on appeal by Anfi. This second stage may take another year and a half or even two, depending very much in which Court of Appeals and Room deals with the case.
Read MoreVictory over PUERTO CALMA. Las Palmas Court of Appeal, room 4, judgement nº 149/2018.
On this occasion, Room 4 of the Court of Appeals upheld the sentence issued by Court No. 4 of San Bartolomé that had already declared the contract null and void, in this case condemning Puerto Calma Marketing and Vista Amadores to pay to my clients the sum of 24,439.42 euros.
Read MoreA total win: Tenerife Court of Appeal room 4, Judgement nº 533/2017 against SILVERPOINT.
In this judgment the Court of Appeal has declared the contracts null and void, ordering Silverpoint Vacations to return the sum of £ 52,550.35 plus another £ 88,960 in concept of money unduly anticipated. In addition, the judgement, as can be seen in the yellow highlighted ...
Read More